![]() |
October 6, 2004 |
Check out our website: www.FarmedAnimal.net Farmed
Animal Watch is sponsored by Animal
Place, Animal
Welfare Trust, Farm
Sanctuary, The Fund
for Animals, Glaser
Progress Foundation, Humane
Society of the United States, and People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals NOTE:
Farmed Animal Watch will not be published on October 13, 2004,
but will return on October 20 featuring a new and improved HTML format. 1. MORE FARMED ANIMAL LEGAL RESOURCES Farmed Animal Watch #70 provided an in-depth look at farmed animal anti-cruelty laws (See http://www.farmedanimal.net/Newsletters/Newslettern70v2.htm). Another invaluable resource covering this topic can be found in "Foxes in the Hen House - Animals, Agribusiness, and the Law: A Modern American Fable," by David Wolfson and Mariann Sullivan. The text comes from a chapter in the book "Animal Rights," April 2004 by Oxford University Press. Also, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) has an in-depth review (PDF document, several hundred pages) covering state-by-state the anti-cruelty laws in the US. The report covers laws relating to animals in general, not specifically farmed animals. Requests can be emailed to the ALDF at info@aldf.org. 2. RISK OF BSE IN ANIMAL FEED RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT RENDERING An October 2nd report from the Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) announced that the Canadian cow discovered last year with Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) was rendered into animal feed, some of which may have been fed back to other cows. The CBC cites the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which has said that some farmers have used feed intended for chickens and pigs to feed cows intended for slaughter. The agency said as many as 1,800 farms could have purchased the feed; 200 operations have been inspected, with 3 quarantined and 63 cows killed as a precautionary measure. The Canadian government has been considering a ban on so-called specified risk materials, including the brains and spinal cords of cows, but no ban has yet been implemented. Subsequent reports have suggested that the BSE-infected cow, which was discovered in Alberta in 2003, was rendered and used in feed for chickens and turkeys, with little likelihood of being fed to other cows.
3. GENETICS: BOVINE GENOME; SALMONELLA RESEARCH BOVINE GENOME: Researchers at universities in the US and Australia are nearing completion of sequencing of the bovine genome, which includes about 35,000 genes (the same number as the human genome). Baylor College in Houston, Texas says it has mapped 85% of the 10,000 bovine gene markers, or those genes that will have the most impact on producing desirable traits in cows used for beef and milk production. The bovine genome project is built upon findings from the three completed mammalian genome projects, including humans, rats, and mice.
4. EWG: "LIVESTOCK" SUBSIDIES APPROACHED $1 BILLION IN 2002 The Environmental Working Group (EWG) on September 8 issued a report on agricultural subsidies, which totaled $114 billion for the years 1995-2002. Of that total, $2.3 billion (2%) was provided as "livestock" subsidies through feed assistance, compensation, and disaster relief programs. Although farmed animal subsidies were a fraction of the overall amount for these years, they do not include conservation-related funds provided to farmers and ranchers. Moreover, there have been large recent increases in farmed animal subsidies; from 2000 to 2001 farmed animal subsidies increased by 122%, and from 2001 to 2002 they increased by 125%. In 2002 total "livestock" subsidies were more than $976 million, according to EWG, which is an environmental, health, and consumer advocacy organization with an emphasis on investigations and research.
5. PIG WELFARE BECOMING EASIER AND MORE COST-EFFECTIVE According to Pork Magazine, consumers do not have specific concerns about how farmed animals are raised, but they expect a minimum level of animal welfare. Activists have not experienced overwhelming success by targeting producers or consumers, but according to John McGlone, an auditing executive, "They hit a gold mine when they discovered the vulnerable link in the food chain - retailers and foodservice operators. Those companies have a brand to protect…" McGlone goes on to say that "retailers have made demands, the livestock industry doesn't want to make all of those changes, but it is preparing to do so." McGlone is the CEO for Farm Animal Care Training and Auditing (FACTA), one of three auditing programs currently available to pig farmers. Others include the Animal Welfare Audit Program (AWAP), the USDA's Process Verified Program, and the separate Swine Welfare Assurance Program (SWAP). An administrator of AWAP said that a likely implementation of a welfare auditing program with audits every 5-10 years would cost pig farmers only 6 cents per pig on average. The estimate is significantly less than that provided by the USDA, which has suggested that auditing expenses would be more than 50% higher than AWAP predicts, and would cost the industry nearly $120 million.
6. UK COMPANY REFUSES SHIPMENT OF LIVE EXPORTS UK shipping company Ferryways on September 24 declined to ship 500 farmed animals and became the third company in the past year to change practices due to pressure from animal activists. Campaigns by Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) and Kent Against Live Exports (KALE) are said to have caused "disruption" to the company's transport of live animals from England to the European mainland and elsewhere. The two groups had threatened Ferryways with a blockade prior to the company's refusal to carry a shipment of live animals, although the company has not issued any official statement. The activists are seeking a maximum journey time for live animals of eight hours, which they believe will end the business for the UK. This compares to a current maximum journey time of 14 hours, which can be followed by another 14 hours of transport after only one hour of rest. Efforts by the European Union last April to pass laws restricting travel times and other welfare conditions for farmed animals reportedly resulted in no action.
7. CALIFORNIA BANS FOIE GRAS PRODUCTION AND SALE FROM 2012 On September 29, 2004, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill into law that will ban the production and sale of foie gras in the state beginning in 2012. Foie gras is produced from the unnaturally bloated livers of force-fed ducks and geese. According to Pam Runquist of the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights (AVAR), "In signing the bill, Schwarzenegger took a significant step in demonstrating his commitment to animal welfare." For his part, Governor Schwarzenegger acknowledged that current foie gras production practices are inhumane, but qualified the new law by saying that the delay "provides 7-1/2 years for agricultural husbandry practices to evolve and perfect a humane way for a duck to consume grain to increase the size of its liver through natural processes." If producers are successful, the Governor says that the ban on foie gras production and sales will not be enacted. Producers in the US and France defend the practice of force-feeding and have criticized the impending ban, although the US accounts for only 2% of France's foie gras exports.
"Americans Eating More Chicken, Fish," Web MD News, Jeanie Lerche Davis, September 29, 2004 |
CONTENTS
RESOURCES ------------------------------- |