![]() |
June
30 , 2004 |
Visit us on the web: www.FarmedAnimal.net Farmed
Animal Watch is sponsored by Animal
Place, Animal
Welfare Trust, Farm
Sanctuary, The Fund
for Animals, Glaser
Progress Foundation, and People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 1. TWO POSSIBLE DISCOVERIES OF BSE IN THE U.S. Preliminary
tests conducted by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) indicate two
separate cases of possible Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE, or “mad
cow” disease) in the United States. The first occurred on June 25,
while the second possible case was announced on June 29. The USDA has
maintained that the tests are inconclusive and that the findings show
that there is no risk to human health. The dead animals’ bodies
are undergoing further testing and results are expected within a few days.
The potential BSE discoveries have come very soon after the USDA announced
expanded BSE testing of more than 220,000 high-risk cows that began in
early June 2004. Responding to the most recent news, one USDA official
said that it was “not unexpected” that the expanded testing
program would find BSE-positive animals. The first case of BSE in the
US was discovered in December 2003 in Washington State (See FAW #39 -
http://www.farmedanimal.net/Newsletters/Newslettern39v2.htm). 2. OTHER BSE NEWS: INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SCIENCE UPDATE In
May 2004 it was announced that 33 million pounds of processed beef had
entered the US from Canada over a six month period, despite a ban on such
products due to the discovery of BSE in Alberta last year (See FAW #52
- http://www.farmedanimal.net/Newsletters/Newslettern52v2.htm).
Now several US senators are saying that the USDA also allowed the import
of cows’ brains and spinal cords, known as “specified risk
materials,” for carrying BSE. Senate minority leader Tom Daschle
and others are calling for an investigation by the USDA’s inspector
general, as well as congressional hearings. The department is also under
fire from food and consumer groups, who on June 22 issued a “report
card” of the USDA’s handling of BSE. The department was given
a “B” for its policy against allowing “downed”
animals in the human food supply and a “C” for identification
and tracking of cows. The USDA received lower grades for eight other issues,
including BSE testing, meat recalls, and labeling. 3. COMMENTS TO USDA OVERHWELMINGLY FAVOR “DOWNER” BAN 99%
of the nearly 22,000 public comments received by the USDA favor a ban
on slaughtering “downed” animals for human consumption, according
to a new report from The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). The
estimate is based on more than 5,200 comments released by the USDA for
public viewing, some from industry groups that favor the ban. However,
there is significant disagreement among industry groups, and several have
changed their positions on the ban since it was originally proposed following
the discovery of BSE in a downed animal last December. HSUS cites the
National Milk Producers Federation, which in May 2004 reversed its position
that the downer ban’s impact would be “fairly minor”
for farmers. Responding to these and similar pressures, two US congressional
representatives in April introduced a bill to reverse the downer ban.
HSUS chief executive Wayne Pacelle, “This bill would gut the common
sense definition of ‘downer’ that was established at the end
of 2003 by the USDA.” 4. GROUP SUES STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR BEEF COVER-UP A
lawsuit has been filed against the Washington State Attorney General’s
office for alleged violation of public records laws relating to the state’s
investigation of IBP in 2000. Humane Farming Association (HFA), an animal
advocacy group, complained to the Attorney General four years ago that
cows at the IBP plant were being “strung up and processed alive.”
According to an HFA news release, public documents indicate that the state’s
investigation was tainted by a pre-formed communication plan and an evident
desire to protect IBP. The HFA suit claims that the state misused “statutory
exemptions to avoid accountability for favoritism toward the company that
was supposed to be the target of the criminal investigation.” HFA
also claims to have documented proof that IBP continues the inhumane and
potentially illegal practice of processing live animals. 5. INTENSIVE ANIMAL FARMING INCREASING RISK OF HUMAN ILLNESS Intensive
farming of animals is making food less nutritious and increasing the risk
of diseases spreading from animals to humans. A group of international
scientists has warned that moving animals from grass-based feed to the
predominantly grain-based feed used for intensive farming may eventually
lead to widespread mental illness. The researchers say that using grain-based
feed results in relatively higher levels of omega-6 lipids in humans compared
to omega-3 lipids. One scientist said of the finding, “We are facing
a health crisis more serious and more dangerous than that posed by obesity
in the West.” Elevated levels of omega-6s and lower levels of omega-3s
are linked to depression and behavior issues.
6. INVESTIGATION SHOWS INHUMANE TREATMENT OF FARMED PHEASANTS In
the UK, a new undercover investigation has revealed that pheasants and
partridges bred for “shooting estates” are raised in “appalling”
conditions. Of the estimated 20 million pheasants bred for hunting each
year, a large number die before being sold; one farm reported a mortality
rate of about 8% is considered successful. Throughout the UK, this translates
to an estimated 1.5 million birds that die prematurely due to intensive
confinement and disease. The investigation also details specific acts
of abuse, including workers “bashing” the head of a disabled
bird against the wall to kill it and using cigarette lighters to cauterize
wounds. One industry representative defended the practice as consistent
with other farming methods, saying it is “no different from any
other type of livestock farming.”
“Understanding and Control of Gangrenous Dermatitis in Poultry Houses,”
University of Arkansas, June 2004
|
CONTENTS
RESOURCES ------------------------------- |