![]() |
May
26 , 2004 |
Visit us on the web at www.FarmedAnimal.net Farmed
Animal Watch is sponsored by Animal
Place, Animal
Welfare Trust, Farm
Sanctuary, The Fund
for Animals, Glaser
Progress Foundation, and People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 1. 33 MILLION POUNDS OF BANNED CANADIAN BEEF ENTERED US The
US Department of Agriculture (USDA) allowed the import of 33 million pounds
of processed beef from Canada, just weeks after the US Agriculture Secretary
affirmed a ban on Canadian beef products due to the discovery of Bovine
Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in Alberta last year. USDA issued a series
of undisclosed permits to meatpackers allowing the import of previously
banned beef products, including ground beef, hamburger patties, pepperoni,
and other products. The issuance of such permits by USDA was halted on
April 19 in accordance with an order from a federal judge. The judge was
responding to a complaint from the Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund
(R-CALF), a consortium of cow and calf farmers who oppose imports in order
to protect the US domestic beef industry. 2. BEEF INDUSTRY NEWS: CLONING AND CONSUMER DEMAND Researchers
in Japan successfully cloned an animal who himself was the clone of a
“prized bull” known for siring more than 165,000 offspring.
This is the first time that scientists have succeeding with “serial
cloning,” which is believed will have significant future implications
for animal farming, though cloning is currently too inefficient for producing
large numbers. The latest cloning of the cloned bull was actually completed
in the year 2000, but an announcement was delayed until researchers were
sure the serially cloned animal was healthy. The bull is said to be both
fertile and devoid of the signs of chromosome deficiency that have been
witnessed in other cloned animals. 3. CONSUMER SURVEYS: LOW-CARB DIETS AND “ETHICAL FOODS” Approximately
one-fifth of Americans have altered their eating habits to some degree
in response to the currently popularity of high-protein, low-carbohydrate
diets, according to a survey by the US chicken and egg industries. Two-thirds
of respondents (67%) say the popularity of such diets has had no impact
on their eating habits. However, twice as many Americans following a low-carb
diet report eating more chicken than eating more beef; 62% of such dieters
are eating more chicken as a result of being on the diet. By comparison,
only 31% are eating more beef and 28% are eating more pork products. The
survey is based on interviews with 1,000 adults and was conducted by the
National Chicken Council and the US Poultry & Egg Association. 4. CHANGES UNDERMINE USDA’S ORGANIC LABELING STANDARDS In
mid April, 2004, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) made public several
changes to the National Organic Program that consumer groups say undermine
the organic standards in favor of large-scale agribusiness. The changes
are significant for farmed animals because they permit the use of antibiotics
on dairy cows, provided that a year passes between the antibiotic treatment
and the time the milk is sold. Watchdog groups argue that this change
will hurt organic consumers and benefit large dairy operations that seek
to commingle organic and non-organic herds. The changes also include allowing
the use of non-organic fishmeal for cows and calves raised for beef, as
well as the announcement that organic standards will not be developed
for fish. As a result, fish farmers are able to use the term organic (though
not the USDA certified label) without meeting any standards at all. USDA
is said to have issued the legally binding changes without input from
the public or from the National Organic Standards Board, the advisory
group set up to establish federal organic standards. 5. GAO REPORT: ANIMAL ANTIBIOTICS THREATEN HUMAN HEALTH Antibiotics
used in animal farming pose a significant risk to humans, according to
a US General Accounting Office (GAO) report released in April. The GAO
looked at other research data on the topic and concluded that “many
of the studies we reviewed found that this transference poses significant
risks for human health.” The report questions the effectiveness
of efforts by several US agencies to combat the growing problem, specifically
critiquing the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) slowness to
assess the risks to humans of antibiotics used in animals. The report
provides two main recommendations: 1) FDA should expedite its antibiotic
risk assessment efforts and 2) the Agriculture Department (USDA) and the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should jointly develop a
plan for collecting data on the use of antibiotics on animals. The GAO
report was criticized recently by the Animal Health Institute, an industry
group that represents manufacturers of animal antibiotics, among others.
The industry group cites several peer-reviewed studies showing that use
of antibiotics in animals poses only a low risk to human health. 6. NEW LAWS PROTECT FARMED ANIMALS IN ISRAEL AND AUSTRIA Lawmakers
in Israel submitted a bill on May 24th that would have a significant positive
impact on the living and dying conditions of farmed animals. The bill
provides specific guidelines for treatment of animals, including space
requirements for pigs as well as a 28-day mandatory allowance for newborn
pigs to stay with their mothers. An article describing the bill stated
that, “animals would be held in conditions that are suited to their
social and psychological behavior… including flying, running, climbing,
or playing in water.” The bill was introduced by several Israeli
lawmakers who say that the country’s 1994 Animal Rights Law was
not being implemented in full.
“What Would You do if Your Company was an Animal Rights Group’s
Target?” MeatNews.com, J. Phillip Lobo, May 18, 2004
|
CONTENTS
RESOURCES ------------------------------- |